Es wäre schön erst mal die Aussagen der erfahrenen Nutzern zu lesen, bevor man sich hier in epischen Wortgefechten mögliche minimale Verbesserungen oder Verschlechterungen um die Ohren schlägt:
(A) Thom Hogan
"As I wrote last week, it’s too early to tell a lot about D810 image quality, as the workflow tools aren’t all there yet. While I have software tools that can help me see what’s happening in the raw data, it doesn’t make any difference if the changes never make it into visibility using the mainstream products, such as the Adobe converters. Even Nikon’s own Capture NX-D doesn’t seem to be optimized fully for the D810. Either that or Nikon thinks that “optimum” has moved its mark slightly ;~)."
"In short, the proprietary nature of things stays proprietary for about one to three months. You can’t change engineering course at a competitor that fast, so there’s really no reason to strive for that level of secretiveness. Had Nikon worked with the top three lens makers and the top five raw converter makers to make sure those companies had all the information they needed prior to the D810’s launch, Nikon would sell more D810’s faster. Why? Because right now I’d have to say that if your’e a raw shooter, you don’t need to be in a hurry to buy a D810, as the software support isn’t there yet. (Yes, I know Adobe has a “release candidate” that does, but it clearly looks to be sub-optimal and not yet fully profiled against the camera.)"
(B) Nasim Mansurov
"It turns out that Adobe’s 8.6 “Release Candidate” is one of those junk beta releases where the converter is doing something funky with handling the D810 RAW files."
Gleiche Aussagen gibt es von Lloyd Chambers, Lance B (Dpreview Forum) und anderen Leuten, die ihr Können durch außerordentliche Bilder und langjährige Erfahrung mit der D800E bewiesen haben.
Wir sollten jetzt einfach noch etwas Geduld bewahren und vielleicht nochmal im September dieses Thema neu beginnen. Bis dorthin sollte es die finalen Kandidaten der bekannten RAW Konverter ACR und Capture One Pro geben.
