Lenses and the D3x
...
Most telephoto lenses I've tried on the D3x look as I'd expect. Low quality ones produce less than ideal results, high quality ones make for impressive resolution results. I was once again reminded of just how good the 200mm f/2 and 400mm f/2.8 are, for example. To a large degree, the same is true at the wide angle end, as high-end recent designs with the post 17-35mm style rear element design do quite well, while earlier inexpensive designs show clear edge to edge issues. The 24mm PC-E, 14-24mm Nikkor, and my Zeiss 18mm and 25mm lenses all do quite well, while my older 20mm f/2.8, 24mm f/2.8, and several other lenses look much weaker as you move from the center of the frame outward (especially in raw files, where chromatic aberration reduction isn't done). This is all to be expected.
....
That said, yes, in general the D3x does highly reveal the faults in a lens if it has any. Even the vaunted 14-24mm and 24-70mm on the D3x reveal that they're not perfect into the corners as some have thought using D3 and D700 bodies. If you're a pixel peeper and trying to extract the largest possible print out of your new D3x, be prepared to do a lot of lens re-evaluation. If you want to take advantage of all those pixels, you need to make sure that both what you put in front of them and how you handle the camera are up to the job. At some later date when I've had a lot more experience at this, I'll probably add some more comments about individual lenses.
Quelle:
http://www.bythom.com/nikond3xreview.htm
Google Übersetzung:
http://translate.google.de/translat...t&prev=/search?q=Test+14-24mm+Nikon+D3x&hl=de
