AW: Der TZ8/TZ10 Bilder-Erfahrungen-Praxis-Thread
Das erste Bild ist links leider nicht scharf bis in die Ecken...
Ok, links oben nicht ganz, aber die Äste könnten auch im Bereich einer anderen Schärfenebene gelegen haben.
Selbst wenn nicht, andere Cams wären froh über diese Schärfe.
Lowlight sind weiter vorne im Thread einige.
http://www.photoreview.com.au/reviews/advanced/panasonic-lumix-dmctz10.aspx
mit interessanten Passagen und einigen Vorteilen gegenüber der Tz7, zb
Exposure metering was generally accurate, particularly when the iExposure setting was switched on...Blown-out highlights were comparatively rare.
Imatest showed saturation to be slightly lower than in the TZ7, which was evident in better colour accuracy in test shots. The review camera also did a slightly better job of reproducing the purplish blues of some flowers.
Best results were obtained at mid-range and longer focal length settings and wider lens apertures.
Interestingly, high ISO performance was better than we measured with the TZ7, particularly at ISO 800 and ISO 1600. But resolution at ISO 200 and ISO 400 was also significantly better with the TZ10 than the TZ7.
Using long exposures at night was easier than with the TZ7 because shutter speeds are adjustable in the S shooting mode.
Auto white balance performance was similar to the TZ7. Lateral chromatic aberration remained almost entirely within the ‘negligible' band and we found little evidence of coloured fringing in test shots taken in bright, contrasty lighting.
Close-up capabilities were generally good. Lens distortion was minimal, with only slight barrel distortion visible at the 4.1mm focal length setting.
