Gast_120364
Guest
Im Netz ist ein neuer Video-Clip bei vimeo zu sehen. Das Original kann man dort auch downloaden (wenn man registriert ist) - es sind allerdings rund 220 MB. Die Qualität ist nicht umwerfend, aber auch nicht schlecht:
http://www.vimeo.com/1641816
Kommentar des Japaners:
"My impression, color saturation is very good. It is similar to my HVX or maybe even better.
I did not think it has good resolution, at least not good enough to shoot clouded people from above. I wonder if it had something to do with M-JPEG compression. Details are simply pixelated.
Rolling shutter issue is there and it is much more serious than HV10, which I own.
Even when I was panning very slow using my video tripod, it somehow showed skewed image of walls."
Die Datenrate ist mit 12.13 mbps noch geringer als beim ersten Clip. Richtig gute Qualität kann man mit dieser Datenrate nicht erreichen. Ich hoffe, dass noch nicht das Letzte raus geholt worden ist. Zumal, wenn man liest, unter welchen Bedingungen das aufgenommen worden ist:
"As for putting up the footage, I would have to say, it is not something that is pleasing to see for I had only limited subject/angle/lens/lighting condition to shoot to and also was told not to shoot faces of people as much as possible. Also, I was not sure how to focus using LCD screen much, I mean, it looked focused but it was not as much.
Also, for the shot of clouded people from above, I was shooting it thorough building window which was thick and had some kind of smoke on it. So picture is not very clear but it shows the pixelated portions here and there...."
http://www.vimeo.com/1641816
Kommentar des Japaners:
"My impression, color saturation is very good. It is similar to my HVX or maybe even better.
I did not think it has good resolution, at least not good enough to shoot clouded people from above. I wonder if it had something to do with M-JPEG compression. Details are simply pixelated.
Rolling shutter issue is there and it is much more serious than HV10, which I own.
Even when I was panning very slow using my video tripod, it somehow showed skewed image of walls."
Die Datenrate ist mit 12.13 mbps noch geringer als beim ersten Clip. Richtig gute Qualität kann man mit dieser Datenrate nicht erreichen. Ich hoffe, dass noch nicht das Letzte raus geholt worden ist. Zumal, wenn man liest, unter welchen Bedingungen das aufgenommen worden ist:
"As for putting up the footage, I would have to say, it is not something that is pleasing to see for I had only limited subject/angle/lens/lighting condition to shoot to and also was told not to shoot faces of people as much as possible. Also, I was not sure how to focus using LCD screen much, I mean, it looked focused but it was not as much.
Also, for the shot of clouded people from above, I was shooting it thorough building window which was thick and had some kind of smoke on it. So picture is not very clear but it shows the pixelated portions here and there...."
